Integrating Educational Technology to Enhance Student Engagement and Self-Regulated Learning at SMA Negeri 5 Bengkulu City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70963/jpr.v3i2.265Keywords:
Digital Learning, Digital Literacy, Self-Regulated Learning, Student Engagement, TPACKAbstract
Educational technology integration in secondary schools should improve the quality of learning experiences rather than merely increase the number of devices or applications. This study aims to describe forms of technology integration, examine their contribution to student engagement and self-regulated learning, and identify implementation constraints at SMA Negeri 5 Bengkulu City in 2025. A qualitative case-study design is employed. Data are planned to be collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with teachers and students, student group discussions, and analysis of digital learning artifacts. Thematic analysis is used to organize patterns of experience and adaptation strategies. The draft findings indicate five major themes: flexible access to learning materials, increased engagement through rapid response opportunities, emerging self-regulation practices, a shift in teachers’ roles toward learning-experience design, and constraints related to connectivity, devices, distraction, and digital literacy. Technology provides the strongest benefits when applications are selected according to pedagogical goals and supported by clear task structures, feedback, and alternative access options. The study emphasizes that integration quality depends on the alignment of technology, pedagogy, content, school support, and students’ capacity to manage their learning. Teacher professional development should therefore focus on designing simple, inclusive, secure, and purposeful digital learning activities
References
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 2.
Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 149–160.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
European Commission. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433–441.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
OECD. (2023). Digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 25.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education. Computers & Education, 122, 136–152.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Kemendikbudristek.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35.
Bower, M. (2017). Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice. Emerald Publishing.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27, 1–12.
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184–205.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 555–575.
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Azizatul Banat, Martiani Martiani , Nadine Ema Azzahara , Reza Dwi Saputra , Rafi Khalish Khairuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
